The Rising Republic: J6, JFK, and the Corn Pop Museum

[00:00:06] I don't want to set the world We are not merely transferring power from one administration to another, or from one party to another, but we are transferring power from Washington DC and giving it back to you, the people. The President.

[00:01:08] And that's all good. Anyway, what a week it has been. Actually, it's been a couple weeks, hasn't it? I think I might have released a double whammy on you guys just last week. Anyway, I don't know, it might have been a couple weeks before that last drop two on you. Anyway, I'm sorry about that. Things have been crazy around here. It's been very, very hectic. It's just, you guys know how life is. I've been sick.

[00:01:33] I caught the rhinovirus and you know, I was down and out hard for two weeks and I had literally just gone on full time police work and I had no benefit time. I couldn't take off, had to power through. And so I did that. And then a couple weeks recovery after that, then I caught some kind of other secondary respiratory. And again, more of the same. This was more chest than the original and a lot of heavy coughing. And a couple weeks of that, and I'm currently on the downhill.

[00:02:03] I'm still coughing, still hacking up some stuff, but at least I got my voice back because there for a while is coughing so hard. Absolutely no voice whatsoever, but I'm thankful that is over with. Anyway, wow. There's just been a lot going on. I know, hey, Trump won the election, right? Trump won the election. And I was really worried. You guys listen to this show. You know, I was worried. First of all, first and foremost for January six, are we going to get past, you know, January six, the confirmation? The votes and all this that has gone on January 6th of every election cycle.

[00:02:33] And then we had to get through January 20th for the formal inauguration. And I'm just thankful that it happened inside. I just had bad feelings all the way around. And I was seriously doubt, doubting the whole way through the last four years, there would even be another Republican president ever again. I should say even a conservative president at that. But it's just something I was worried about because the state of the affairs has been going in such the wrong direction. And it seemed like we were going in a direction that we could never come back from. And I have to admit, I made a mistake.

[00:03:01] I miscalculated and underestimated America's resilience. We came back. We came back from it. I'm not a big fan of executive orders. There's a lot of work to do. You know, guys know that everybody's listening to this. I'm not a big fan of executive orders. Trump has been signing a lot of executive orders and executive orders are fine for things that are not law binding things for the cabinet and the way the government operates. For example, those are those. Those that's what executive orders should be used for.

[00:03:29] Kind of, you know, policy and procedure, not for law. The executive branch does not write law. Let me just make that perfectly clear. That's what the legislative branch is for. That's what the House is for. That's what the Senate is for. Together, they are Congress and the vice president is the chairperson of the Senate. And they vote only when there is a tie in the Senate.

[00:03:52] And then, you know, if they approve a bill between the House writes a bill or approves and goes to the Senate and vice versa, and then it goes on up to the president and he can either veto it or sign it into law. That's how laws are made. It's not designed for a president to write with a pen, the power of the pen to write just a pen stroke or two and make a law. That's not how this country operates. And unfortunately, that's how things have been in the past. And we don't want it to be that way no more. And America has spoken.

[00:04:22] Anyway, so Trump has signed several executive orders, which are binding to his administration. I haven't gone through. There's been some 200 executive orders. Again, not a fan of executive orders. But so far, the ones that I've seen, I'm a big fan of them. And I just want to play some soundbites, maybe talk a little bit about, you know, some of the executive orders that I've heard him sign. When I say heard, I mean, I'm listening to audio.

[00:04:49] I'm watching videos on YouTube of him signing these executive orders. And he has somebody there sometimes telling him what the executive order is. Of course, he knows what these are before he signs them. But he wants a narrator to let him know so that people understand what is being signed and we can have a big part of the process. All that being said, these are just some of the executive orders that Donald Trump signed on day one. The initial recession of harmful executive orders in action.

[00:05:18] So a bunch of the executive orders that Biden wrote, he basically undid them. That's how simple it is to get rid of an executive order. If they're not signed into law, when there's a something, when there's a law that goes through the legislative process, the way it's supposed to be, a law could only be changed by the legislative process. Okay.

[00:05:35] So if you're going to come in as a president and think that you want to sign into law via executive order, which isn't the way that it works or certainly the way it was designed, then the next president comes in behind you can simply write an executive order that gets rid of it. It's quite simple. So he did that. He got rid of several executive orders that Biden wrote. Thank God that that happened. He restored freedom of speech ending federal censorship. There was a lot of that going on. You guys heard me complain about this in the past with tick tock or Twitter.

[00:06:05] I've talked about the Twitter files. I've also talked about how Zuckerberg has communicated and talked about how the Biden administration treated him and talked out to them and made them censor conservative leaning voices. He also in the weaponization of the federal government, which should never have been a problem to begin with. He simply signed executive order, which, you know, if some, some, here's the kick with this.

[00:06:30] They were, there's no executive order or no law saying you can't weaponize the law against the president because nobody's ever been that stupid to do such a thing. Nobody's ever said, let's weaponize the law against president, but it happened here. You know, we've seen it with all the sham trials that they put Trump through. Okay. So here's the thing. So he wrote an executive order citing making illegal via executive order to essentially ends weaponization of the federal government. Okay.

[00:06:59] So we can't go after a president. We can't, we can't create law fair, so to speak. So this is brilliant to me because first of all, there should not be, there should, there should not be a law saying you can't do this because it goes without saying you don't misuse and abuse the law. Unfortunately, there's judges who allow this to happen. Merchant, excuse me, who allow this kind of thing to happen.

[00:07:25] So what president who would come behind him, just out of curiosity, I'm just thinking what president would come behind him and say, you know what, I'm going to write an executive order that re-engages the weaponization of the federal government against, against former presidents. You see what I'm saying? Nobody. So him writing this executive order is kind of brilliant because who's going to come behind him and undo that? Crazy. So another one is I put the America first in international environmental agreements.

[00:07:52] The application of protecting Americans from foreign adversary controlled applications act like on TikTok, for example, I'm going to try to read this application of protecting Americans from foreign adversary controlled applications act to TikTok. You know, TikTok has been kind of a big deal. And if you had TikTok and they shut it down, what was it? I want to say January 28th. I think I might know. No, no, I'm sorry. January 19th.

[00:08:21] I might assume around there. So around mid, mid, mid, mid to on the late side of January, mid side of late January. They shut down TikTok because of the ban that went into law. Okay. So it pretty much went down. They no longer, which means there's no spyware. It's not attached. It's that you can't go and download it anymore. Like you cannot download TikTok. If you have currently, if you currently have TikTok on your devices, you can still access TikTok. It went away for like half a day for like 12 hours. And then it came back.

[00:08:52] So if you already had TikTok and you never deleted off your phone, guess what? It's still there. You can go log back in and you can mess around TikTok. You just can't get no updates. Unfortunately, if you deleted TikTok guys, you can't go and download it again because Play Store and Google Store, Apple Store, all these places where you go and get these apps are not going to have it anymore. He withdrew. He withdrew, thank God, the United States for the World Health Organization. That's a biggie. I'm so thankful for that.

[00:09:21] We don't need the World Health Organization who pushes a lot of global control upon and the confiscation of rights, American rights, bodily autonomy, stripping us of that kind of thing. We don't need that. We don't need any kind of outside entity, even inside entities bad enough. We don't need no outside entity trying to tell us what we can and can't do with our bodies, trying to force mandates and all this. It'd basically be the Biden administration on steroids.

[00:09:51] He restored accountability to policy influencing positions with the federal workforce. He's holding formal. He wrote an executive order to hold former government officials accountable for election interference and improper disclosure of sensitive government information. Everybody see everybody. If Trump was guilty of this, why would you write an executive order to hold them accountable? You see what I'm saying?

[00:10:14] It's because the Democrats in the past have always accused, been the accusers of things that they were actually, in fact, guilty of. So they would do something insanely like collude with Russians and then blame Trump for colluding with Russia. Hey, Hillary. Yeah. So he did that. He clarified the military's role in protecting the territorial integrity of the United States.

[00:10:42] He wrote an executive order unleashing American energy. Drill, baby, drill. Realigning the United States refugee admission program. Protecting the meaning and value of American citizenship. In other words, you guys, when you come into this country, you ought to be able to speak English. You ought to be able to take a test of American history. Do you remember back in the old days when you see videos of people who went through the process the correct way? And people were taking pictures, recording videos.

[00:11:10] And they were so proud that they waited and they went through the process. They became actual American citizens. That's how it should be. There should be a test. Absolutely should know our language. You should be able to speak English. She should be able to take a test of American history and know these kinds of things. You shouldn't be able to go to a driver's license facility and have less documentation to get a license than an actual U.S. citizen does. And that actually happened to me and my son. I took my son. We went to get his driver's license.

[00:11:35] He had more documentation than an illegal immigrant to my right who was able to get a driver's license with one sheet of paper. One sheet of paper and got a driver's license. And that's not fair. It's not fair to the American people. He's securing the borders again. Thank God. Restoring the death penalty and protecting public safety. Declaring a national energy emergency. Re-evaluating and realigning United States foreign aid. Protecting the American people against invasion.

[00:12:03] Unleashing Alaska's extraordinary resource potential. Protect the United States from foreign terrorists and other national security and public safety threats. America first policy. Directive to the Secretary of State. He's establishing and implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency. That's the thing that Elon Musk is a part of with Vivek Rambaswamy. There's a third person in there. And I think they're going to do a great job. And they already got rid of something.

[00:12:32] Did you guys know this? I did not know this. That Biden actually had a museum. The taxpayer funded museum for corn pop. I kid you not. Corn pop. Do you guys remember that? Here. Let me see if I can pull this up real quick here. Corn pop. Corn pop was a bad dude. And he ran a bunch of bad boards. And I did. And back in those days, to show how things have changed, one of the things you had to use,

[00:13:00] if you use pomade in your hair, you had to wear a bathing cap. And so he was up on the board, wouldn't listen to me. I said, hey, Esther, you. Off the board. Or I'll come up and drag you off. Well, he came off. And he said, I'll meet you outside. My car, this was mostly, these were all public housing behind it. My car, there was a gate out here. I parked my car outside the gate. And I, he said, I'll be waiting for you. He was waiting for you. Three guys in straight racers. There was a guy named Bill Wright, the only white guy. And he did all the pulls.

[00:13:30] He was the mechanic. And I said, what am I going to do? He said, come down here in the basement where mechanics, where all the pull filter is. You know, the chain, there used to be a chain that went across the deep end. And he cut off a six foot length of chain. He pulled up. He said, you walk out with that chain. And you walk to the car and say, you may cut me, man, but I'm going to wrap this chain around your head. I said, you're kidding me. He said, no, if you don't, don't come back. And he was right.

[00:13:59] So I walked out with the chain. And I walked up to my car. And they had, those days, you used to remember the straight racers, you'd bang them on the curb, get them rusty, put them in a rain barrel, get them rusty. And I looked at them, but I was smart then. I said, first of all, I said, when I tell you get off the board, you get off the board and I'll kick you out again. But I shouldn't have called you. Esther Williams, I apologize for that. I apologize, but I didn't know that apology was going to work.

[00:14:29] He said, you apologize to me? I said, I apologize for that. Not for throwing you out, but I apologize for what I said. He said, okay. He closed the straight razor and my heart began to beat again. And by the way, you know, I sit on the stand and it get hot. I got a lot of, I got hairy legs that turned, that, that, that, that, that turned blonde in the sun. And the kids used to come up and reach in the pool and rub my leg down.

[00:14:56] So it was straight and then watch the hair come back up again. They look at it. So I learned about roaches. I learned about kids jumping on my lap. And I've loved kids jumping on my lap. Of course, Joe, you love kids jumping on your lap. What a weirdo. So that's corn pop. And so when I talk about Doge, the department of government efficiency, doing a good job, that's what I'm talking about. Elon Musk, I believe is the one who, who found this.

[00:15:24] At least the reporting I saw is the one that said, uh, Elon Musk, uh, got rid of the corn pop museum. It was like the first thing he did when he took office. So on January 20th, corn pop had a taxpayer. Biden created this, a taxpayer funded museum. That's my friend is government waste. I think actually, you know, this is just me, but I don't think any president should have any kind of museum until they may be

[00:15:53] perhaps deceased. You know, they've actually become history. I don't think Trump should be saving stuff, uh, and creating his own museum. You know, Clinton did it. Obama did it. All these presidents, they're, they're still living. They have their own presidential museums. I think that's hogwash. I think there should be some number of years past, uh, before presidents should have a museum. That's just me speaking. I don't let me know. Guys know what you think about that. Uh, but that's just me. And I'm thankful that doge got came up, came together and got rid of that. Uh, thank goodness. Freaking corn pop.

[00:16:23] I love kids jumping on my lap. Anyway, uh, uh, he signed an executive order defending women from gender ideology, extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government. I got another soundbite. I'm gonna play on that one a little bit later. I'm thankful for this one. I'm a big supporter of this one. I'm so sick of the woke gender ideology thing and the pronouns. It's ridiculous. He's getting rid of it in the federal government. I know my brother is a federal employee. He's going to be happy to see it go.

[00:16:51] Uh, I am, you know, I, I was a state employee. If I was still working, it would probably, I'd still be seeing it because we work for J.D. Pritzker and he's far, far from, from removing such nonsense. Uh, ending radical and wasteful government DEI programs and, and, and preferencing. That's good. That's absolutely good because we should, nobody, nobody should be hired. Based upon who they're having sex with. Which is what DEI is. Diversity, equity, inclusion.

[00:17:21] It's not all about, you know, hiring black people. You know, that's what we've had affirmative action for all these years. Uh, you know, that kind of thing. Um, DEI is about hiring, uh, LGBTQ, LMNOP, the alphabet folks. Why does everything have to be sexual related? If you're gay, just be gay and do it quietly. Do it professionally. Be quiet about it. Nobody cares what your sexual preference is. We shouldn't be hiring people based upon who they sleep with at night or what their sexual preferences are.

[00:17:50] That's perversion. So he's reforming that. Thank goodness. Uh, designating cartels and other organizations as, as foreign terrorist organizations and specifically designated as global terrorists. I'm not sure what to think about this one because terrorism has a very specific set of definitions and you just can't label someone a terrorist. Uh, it has to have specific everything that the cartel, for example, they have to be, have some kind of, I want to say religious motivation.

[00:18:20] Uh, as I recall it, there's very strict guidelines unless they've chipped away at it through the years. There's very specifics that you have to meet criteria to meet, be, to be labeled a terrorist. And I'm not sure the cartels will be considered it's more, it's a criminal organization. I don't know that it could be identified as, as a, as a foreign terrorist organization. I don't know. Maybe I'm wrong. I'm, I'm not a politician anyway. Uh, let me see here.

[00:18:48] Restoring names that honor American greatness. So yeah, those are some, that's just on day one. So he's been, he was very busy on day one. Um, here's a soundbite. I want to play on the January 6th mass pardon. And then we'll get back to some of this other stuff here real quick here, but listen to this, the January 6th mass pardon. Yes, sir. First, we have a list of, uh, of pardons and commutations relating to events that occurred

[00:19:17] on January 6th, 2021. Okay. And how many people is this? Uh, I think this order will apply to approximately 1500 people, sir. So this is January 6th. And these are the hostages. Approximately 1500 for a pardon. Yes. Full pardon. Full pardon or commutations? Full pardon.

[00:19:43] We have about six commutations in there where we're doing further research. Nice to see you again. So this is a big one. Anything you want to explain about this? We, we hope they get them. We hope they come out tonight, frankly. They're expecting it.

[00:20:13] Approximately 1500 people. Six, six commutations. Were there any cases you did not, community or pardon of people? We're looking at different things. But, uh, the commutations would be the ones that we'll take a look and maybe it'll stay that way or it'll go to, in a full pardon. And the order does require the Bureau of Prisons to act immediately on receipt of the pardons and commutation orders. So that's all good news.

[00:20:39] What I don't like about this is that the loony left is already attacking it. And I guess at some point it was reported and I haven't seen it in the January 6th commission reports, but some of the left, and when I talk to, I'm talking about, you know, the mainstream media, the legacy media are confronting Trump in, in their line of questioning. And they're asking him specifically about some J6 rider that grabbed a taser and shocked a police officer.

[00:21:07] I haven't heard such a thing until recently. That seems, it's crazy if that's their focus. That's their focus. When we have, uh, we have Biden who just left office and he pardoned how many people, some of them were cop killers, rapists and child killers. And not a single one of them questioned Joe Biden about that stuff, but they want to question this.

[00:21:36] And that's, that's the direction they, despite the landslide red wave victory that just happened, they're completely oblivious to that. And this is why their ratings continue to sink and plunder because they're concerned about this ludicrously. People are actually asking these dumb questions when the ex president who just walked out of office, pardon, cop killers, rapists and child killers.

[00:22:05] And that to me is sickening. Here's a one on the gender identity, uh, executive order that said we'd talk about, but there is a significant change in these executive orders. This is CBS news definitions. Let me read to you what the executive orders will say. It will be the policy of the U S government to recognize two sexes, male and female federal employees will use sex and not gender in all agency communications.

[00:22:35] Agencies will reflect sex accurately at the state department and the department of Homeland Security. These executive orders outline, including on government documents and on passports, the government will not support gender ideology through any communication forums. These executive orders will say, including transgender visibility day. The executive orders will promote privacy in single sex spaces like rape shelters, migrant shelters and prisons.

[00:23:01] These are all parts of not only the way the federal government is organized, but the way it talks to itself and it talks to the country. And on this question of sex or gender, these executive orders to come are quite explicit. What hip hip hooray hip hip hooray. Can I get an applause from somebody from anybody? Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

[00:23:30] Yes, that is good news. That's really good news. I'm thankful for that. You know, my kids are grown up. I still have a 15 year old. God forbid I ever see a man walking into the restroom behind her. Just saying. Let's take a moment real quick here to hear from our sponsor. Who is on your side, PBN family? When it comes to health care, I know no better ally than the folks at the wellness company.

[00:23:57] They've been our sponsor now for months and I want you to look at their monthly membership. Visit TWC.health slash PBN for $10 a month or less. Your membership gets you discounted supplements and wellness products, discounted virtual care and discounts on most specialty telehealth services. I'm talking allergy immunotherapy, freedom from pharma, vaccine injury. These people get it. They get you and they are the future of health care.

[00:24:26] Visit TWC.health slash PBN. Okay. What about Trump also declassified a lot of the JFK stuff? RFK was on board with it. He was, he was like, he's like, I think it's a good idea. He said, because there needs to be transparency.

[00:24:44] There was some, I guess a letter that went out from one of the, uh, the kids of, uh, of, of Robert F. Kennedy that, that they're playing that went down and something about the truth is, is far worse, uh, more sorrowful or more sad. Uh, I don't know. Um, I don't know. All, all, there's just a lot of stuff going in. I haven't got my hands on the declassified information.

[00:25:11] What I have heard though, is that it's been declassified finally. And there was some stuff in there about, uh, North operation Northwoods. Apparently operation Northwoods was declassified sometime ago in March of 1962.

[00:25:28] And, but there's references to this in this declassification, uh, information that, uh, that Trump just declassified because apparently the assassination of, of JFK was part and partial to that Northwoods, uh, operation Northwoods. And basically if you haven't looked it up, go look up operation Northwoods. Again, this is 1962 when it was declassified in March. And there's a lot of sinister stuff on there.

[00:25:57] And I'm quoting here from, from the, from the 12th page. It's like 12 pages. And it was all signed by the joint chiefs. And it says, it actually says, quote, commit heinous acts against us citizens to justify war with Cuba. And it goes on to talk about other things like blowing up us ships and saying that Cuba did it. You see what I'm saying? So this, this is how, and this is where the left has been with their media for a long time. They literally will believe anything that the government tells them.

[00:26:26] So here we have in 1962, it's been declassified all these years, some 60 years it's been declassified. And the, and from that point on, I mean, the media could literally just be told anything by the government. You know, you hear them talking about it. Ultimately, JFK said, no, I'm not going to do it. And he was assassinated for it. And that was part of the information that was released. But it's just incredible to me that I've never heard Northwoods, Operation Northwoods.

[00:26:54] But to think that the atrocities, any atrocity against American citizens, what the government will do to justify an agenda is appalling to me. They were doing it back then. And I still believe that they're doing it today. I believe they're doing it in, in much more heinous ways than, than blowing up us ships, but atrocities against us citizens. I still believe we're seeing that. I really, really do. I think the government's doing it and I believe they're doing it to justify gun control.

[00:27:21] You know, you've all heard the conspiracies and the crisis actors and a lot of these people that are showing up in crisis after crisis. As long as they're within a few, you know, not far apart from each other, you can see these people again and again and again. And it's looking up for yourself. You know, I don't want to dive too deep because, again, I don't know. This show here, I talk about conspiracies every once in a while. And I always tell you to go and look it up for yourself. I can't say yay or nay for sure.

[00:27:47] But all, wow, if they don't look like twins, a lot of these, these people could be crisis actors. They look from moving from this place to this, boom, they get killed and then they're alive again over here. It's just, it seems awful weird or a crisis actor talking about how they, they went to school there and they saw this, they saw that. Then all of a sudden they're in the school over here. Like how many times is this guy going to, this lady going to be in a, in an atrocity, in a, in a grade school atrocity or high school atrocity where there's shooters involved.

[00:28:17] You know, like active shooting situations. How many times, this person is highly, highly unlucky, very, very unlucky. And Pam Bondi seems to be doing a really good job. She's been, she's been, I heard Pete, Pete Hegseth got, got confirmed. But Pam Bondi is still, I guess, in the hot seat and there's some kind of delay thanks to pencil neck shift.

[00:28:38] But I just want to, I, I, I would be remiss if I didn't play a little clip here, just a couple minutes of Pam Bondi totally owning Adam Schiff because he's a, he's a nasty person. He's, he's a bad, a bad, he's a, in Bindu, a bad dude. Let's listen to this. This is Pam Bondi again and Adam Schiff. Are you frightened because evidence was destroyed against President Trump that was false?

[00:29:05] The president has said Jack Smith should go to jail. Will you investigate Jack Smith? Senator, I haven't seen the file. I haven't seen the investigation. I haven't looked at anything. It would be irresponsible of me to make a commitment regarding anything without, you're, you're, you're a long practicing attorney without looking at a file.

[00:29:30] So you would need a factual, you would need a factual predicate to open an investigation of Jack Smith, is that right? Not a summary by you sitting here. Yes, sir. And not a summary by the president either, right? Absolutely. So a summary by the president or his desire to investigate Jack Smith would not be enough for you to open an investigation of Jack Smith. Is that right? I will look at the facts and evidence in any case. You know, you know, and sitting here, sitting here, sitting here today. What are they worried about?

[00:30:00] If Jack Smith didn't do anything wrong, then why all the pardons? If Biden's family didn't do anything wrong, then why all the pardons? And that's another thing. Biden actually recently pardoned his family. And, and, oh, Anthony Fauci. That's a big one. He pardoned Anthony Fauci for crimes and his family for crimes they may have committed. You know, that's not going to hold up. And it's outside the scope of a pardon. Crimes they may have committed. Really?

[00:30:26] And you think that Russia or Sweden or any of these other countries that are against a lot of this, this, these crimes against humanity that Anthony Fauci is guilty of, that, that a pardon in the United States is going to sate their hunger to see him swinging from a tree? They want this man to answer for the crimes and atrocities he's committed against humanity. And it only makes me think, I already know he knew that he's guilty.

[00:30:56] I've known this the whole time of these atrocities. But Biden knows it too. That makes him complicit. Otherwise, why would he be pardoning him? Back to Adam Schiff trying to protect Jack Smith. Adam Schiff trying to protect Jack Smith. Senator, 72% of Americans have lost faith in the Department of Justice. Sitting here today, are you aware of any factual predicate to investigate Jack Smith? Sitting here today, yes or no? Senator, I will look at the facts and the circumstances of anything brought to me.

[00:31:25] You can't answer that question? You're not a part of the department yet. There's no worry about divulging law enforcement sensitive information. So just tell us, are you aware of a factual predicate to investigate Jack Smith? Investigate Jack Smith, yes or no? Senator, what I'm hearing on the news is far off. Do I know he committed a crime? I have not looked at it. You seem reluctant to answer a simple question. Let me ask you a different simple question. The president also wants to jail Liz Cheney.

[00:31:51] Sitting here today, are you aware of any factual basis to investigate Liz Cheney? Yes or no? Senator, that's a hypothetical, and I'm not going to answer that question. No, no, it's not a hypothetical. I'm asking you, sitting here today, whether you are aware. Why would she disclose that anyway? If she had evidence and information, why would she disclose that information to him? You see what I'm saying? You don't do that. You don't disclose information ahead of an investigation.

[00:32:18] You don't disclose what evidence you have to the defense, which Adam Schiff would be on the defense because he's neck deep in the left lunacy. Why would you disclose? Why would anybody disclose evidence ahead of an investigation or a trial, a future trial? You would not. And she should not answer that question. And she's right in doing so. A factual predicate to investigate Liz Cheney. Senator, no one has asked me to investigate Liz Cheney. That is a hypothetical.

[00:32:48] The president has called for it publicly. You are aware of that, aren't you? No one has asked me to investigate Liz. But the president has called for this. We're also worried about Liz Cheney, Senator. The president has called for this. You know what we should be worried about? Ms. Bonnie, please answer my questions. The crime rate in California right now is through the roof. Ms. Bonnie, my question is this. That's what I want to be focused on, Senator. Do you have the power to say no to the president?

[00:33:13] And what you're suggesting today by your non-answer is you don't have the independence to say no to the president. So let me ask you a different question. It also requires you, if you're going to be a good attorney general, to be able to tell hard truths to the president. So my questions now are can you tell hard truths to the president? So let me start with an easy truth that you could speak to the president. Can you tell us, can you tell him that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election? Can you say that?

[00:33:43] Do you have the independence to say that? Do you have the gravitas, the stature, the intestinal fortitude to say, Donald Trump, you lost the 2020 election. Can you tell us that here today? Senator, what I can tell you is... This slide of question right here is coming from a man who is a part of the system that refused to say that Joe Biden was incapable and mentally inept. And they said that he was 100%, that he was focused like a laser beam, that he was intense, that he's absolutely up to the job.

[00:34:12] There's nothing wrong with him. On and on and on. Like they praised him and rolled out a red carpet, laid, throwed rose petals out before him when he walked. Until the debate with Trump. And after that, they freaked out. They got all scared. And voila, all of a sudden, the unclassified documents case that they were investigating Biden for came back that, well, we can't really do any, we can't really charge him because he's kind of senile. They didn't use those words, but, you know, he's kind of senile. Wow.

[00:34:43] And these guys went in full panic mode, and that's why they went and put Kamala Harris up, rather unceremoniously, put a crown upon her head, and went against the entire election process that the American people are accustomed to. They chose their person. They chose the next puppet. They put this meat muppet up in there. This is who is making this line of question. He's saying, do you have the intestinal fortitude to ask the hard questions to President Trump?

[00:35:12] This guy right here, Adam Schiff, who did not have the intestinal fortitude to say that Joe Biden was inept and that he was incapable of being the President of the United States. I will never play politics. You're trying to engage me in a gotcha. I won't do it. I won't play politics with any ongoing investigation. So let me ask you another question. Like you did leaking your colleague Devin Nunes' memo. If you can't answer the question, let me ask you a different, what should be a simple truth, not a hard one.

[00:35:41] Was there massive fraud affecting the result of the 2020 election? We all know yes, there was. Senator, I'm glad you asked that question if you'll let me answer what I saw in Pennsylvania. No, I asked a simple question about massive fraud. I can only tell you what I saw in Pennsylvania. No, no, no, I know you want to answer a different question, but my question is, can you tell us whether there was massive fraud affecting the results of the 2020 election? Yes or no. Was there or was there not? I can tell you what I saw when I went as an advocate to the campaign. That's not my question. So you can't answer that question.

[00:36:11] You can't speak that even easy truth to us, let alone to the President. So let me ask you a different question. It will also be important that you give good advice to the President. Are you prepared to advise the President not to pardon people who beat police officers? Senator, as I said, the pardons are at the direction of the President. We will look and we will advise. I will look at every case on a case-by-case basis. Okay, good.

[00:36:41] And I abhor violence to police officers. Follow up with that. So will it be your advice to the President? Mr. President, I know you said you want to issue hundreds of pardons on day one. Will it be your advice to the President? No, Mr. President, I need to go over them on a case-by-case basis. Do not issue blanket pardons. Will that be your advice to the President? Where was this guy when the cities were burning down because of BLM?

[00:37:07] Where was this guy when Portland was burning, when Minneapolis was burning? Where was this guy? Where was he? Well, there were mostly peaceful protests. The hypocrisy here. It's absolutely mind-boggling. Senator, I have not looked at any of those files. If confirmed, I will look at the files for the parties as well as the ongoing investigation. Will you review hundreds of cases on day one? I will look at every file I am asked to look at. Of course you won't. So will you advise the President?

[00:37:36] Can I answer the question? Well, my question is- I would have plenty of staff. You said, of course you want? You'll be able to review hundreds of cases on day one? Listen, I'm not going to mislead this body, nor you. All right, let me ask another question. You don't want to answer that. Let me answer another question. You were censured by Congress, Senator, for comments just like this that are so reckless. So it will also be important for you to be able to preserve the records, the evidence of the department.

[00:38:02] Are you ready to commit that none of the evidence in the January 6th investigation will be destroyed under your watch? Senator, I will- Holy moly. You do understand, everybody listening to this, that the Democrats destroyed a lot of January 6th records. They destroyed tons of them. And that's why a lot of them are freaking out. Because they're worried about a commission to investigate the commission.

[00:38:29] Because they were there, and they were manipulating video, and they have exculpatory evidence. For those of you who don't know what exculpatory evidence is, it's evidence that would have worked out in favorability of the defendant, in this case, Donald Trump. They had exculpatory evidence that would have said Donald Trump is not guilty. And Liz Cheney and people like him that was working in this January 6th on this commission, they suppressed that information. They hid it. They concealed it. They destroyed it.

[00:39:00] And that's going to be coming out pretty soon. And these guys are all freaking out about it. Stand by. I cannot wait for that to come out. People need to go to jail for that one. Because we had 1,500 people sitting in jail since January 6th, 2021. 1,500 people that had no Fifth Amendment rights. Their Fifth Amendment rights were completely squandered. Ryan just texted me and said, sorry. He's been splitting wood. It's okay.

[00:39:30] Anyway, so they were completely denied their due process. They were completely denied all this stuff. And their Sixth Amendment also, their fair and speedy trial, an impartial jury, the ability to confront their witnesses, all of that. Sixth Amendment. They were denied their constitutional rights. And they've been kept in jail in gulag-type cells all this time. And they were just now freed by Donald Trump, who pardoned them. Not all of them are completely innocent. Some of them broke things.

[00:39:57] But other people who went to jail were simply on the grounds, which they can be. It's the people's property. They were on the grounds, and they were peacefully protesting. Not breaking anything. Not hurting anyone. They went to prison for that. Gulag-style jails. This guy is questioning her about hiding evidence of January 6th. Are you serious? It's just the other way around. This is exactly what I'm talking about. They always flip the script, and they accuse what they're actually guilty of. Follow the law.

[00:40:27] I will consult with ethical officials in the department. Do you see any ethical basis to destroy evidence in the January 6th investigation? Then why can't you answer the question? Why can't you say, I commit to this committee, we will never destroy the evidence in the January 6th investigation. Why can't you give this committee and the American people that assurance? Are you frightened because evidence was destroyed against President Trump? Is that why you're frightened now? I can't believe this is even. Boom. Why do you have difficulty answering that question? He can't even answer that question.

[00:40:56] Why do you have difficulty promising to preserve evidence at the Department of Justice? Why is that a difficult question? I will follow the law. It shouldn't be a difficult question. I wouldn't answer that hoodlum either. I can't stand him. She literally just said, are you worried that the evidence that you guys destroyed is going to be discovered? And he completely ignored that and went right back to his letter of questioning. Insanity. Absolute insanity.

[00:41:25] Anyway, guys, that concludes this episode of The Rising Republic. I'm so thankful you guys are here listening to me this week. It's been a crazy one. I'm going to get back to healing up, get back to my life. And you guys take care of yourselves. God bless. You guys, I can't wait to see you again. Take care out there wherever you're listening to me. Thank you for listening to The Rising Republic. I'm L. Douglas Hogan. And on behalf of my sidekick, Ryan Buford, y'all have a good one. God bless.